« Lingo Outage? | Main | Comcast: Another day, another outage »

Apr 21, 2005



I am no accountant by any streatch of imagination. But if this is the true reason, then wouldn't recognizing only the minutes consumed as revenue and the rest to be "held in escrow" do the trick? Alternatively, why not plow the money back into the social pool and give it back.


This is a real problem.

You do recognize the revenue as the minutes are delivered. That's not the problem here.

The problem is the increasing account balance pool represents a future liability to deliver service. This becomes a deferred revenue liability. Unless you have a means, like a balance expiration, to convert this to revenue and relieve the liability you show a large current liability offsetting your assets.

This behavior is certainly not unique to Skype.

As for plowing the money into the social pool, which social pool is that? Once Skype expires the account and recognizes these funds as revenue, they flow to the bottom line. Skype can reinvest (plow) that money into their business or return that money as a dividend to their shareholders.


Like I said I don't understand accounting priciples and I also know that this occurs in many places like gift cards. But I also know that it doesn't happen in many places like Traveller's checks. Since the liability is offset by the asset given by the users and not the company's anyway I really miss what the problem. I am sure it is a basic accounting principle that I am being too dense to follow.

As far the social pool, let us say that at the end of April you want to clear 310 minutes; then everyday in the month of May, you do not charge the first 10 mins. The lucky ones are the recipiant of the booty. This specific example is not important, but the idea is like a coop the user pool benefits, even if it is not equitable.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo



Twitter Tweets

Nemertes Research: Latest Content

Blogs Where I Post

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 11/2004